Skip to main content

Spectrum: Autism Research News

Community Newsletter: Kavli Prize puts spotlight on autism science, plus a genetics PSA

by  /  5 June 2022
Many mouths making conversation, with speech bubbles in red and blue.
Illustration by Laurène Boglio

Autism-related science spent some time in the spotlight this week when the Kavli Prize in Neuroscience went to geneticists Jean-Louis Mandel, Harry Orr, Christopher Walsh and Huda Zoghbi, for “pioneering the discovery of genes underlying a range of serious brain disorders.”

Zoghbi, whom Spectrum profiled a year ago, is known for — among other accomplishments — her discovery of the gene responsible for Rett syndrome, which is often accompanied by autism. Walsh, whom we profiled in 2008, has discovered multiple genes involved in neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism.

Congratulations poured in for all four recipients. “This is fantastic,” tweeted Hunt Willard, chief scientific officer at Genome Medical in San Francisco, California, summing up the sentiments of many on social media.

Sylvain Lesné, associate professor of neuroscience at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, included a photo of himself with Zoghbi and Orr. Others, such as Chao J. Liu, research fellow at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, called out their good fortune to have worked with one of the winners.

Kavli kudos also came from neurogeneticist Kevin Mitchell, of Wiring the Brain fame, who tweeted his own helpful public service announcement on the field of genetics. It is “not about genes causing traits,” he began, but rather “about how *variation* in genes causes *variation* in traits.”

Mitchell, associate professor of genetics and neuroscience at Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland, carried on with seven threaded tweets to explain that although the field’s methods may be reductive — say, knocking out a single gene to see the effects on brain development — that need not lead to reductive theories.

Robert W. Williams, department chair of genetics, genomics and informatics at the University of Tennessee in Memphis, described the addition of the word ‘variation’ as “perfect.” He added that it’s an edit he, as a co-author, is compelled to make on many genetics papers and grant applications each year.

Well said,” tweeted Josh Dubnau, professor of neurobiology and behavior at Stony Brook University in New York, in response, while noting that it is still useful to derive “incomplete/typically false models of biology from reductionist experiments.”

“Each model, utilizing Occam’s razor, is the “straw person” that gets destroyed by the next experiment,” Dubnau wrote. “This we zig zag towards truth.”

That’s it for this week’s Community Newsletter as we zig zag toward a new week of tweets. If you have any suggestions for interesting social posts you saw in the autism research sphere, feel free to send an email to [email protected].

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter (@Spectrum), Instagram and LinkedIn.

Subscribe to get the best of Spectrum straight to your inbox.

Cite this article: https://doi.org/10.53053/GPGG8017