Crosstalk Debates and conversations about timely topics in autism.
Opinion / Cross Talk

Can a drug for a parasitic disease really treat autism?

by  /  6 August 2014

In June, we reported on findings suggesting that a single dose of a drug called suramin — used for a century to treat African sleeping sickness — improves symptoms of autism in a mouse model. The mainstream press also picked up the ‘100-year-old treatment cures autism’ story.

The researchers — Robert Naviaux and his colleagues at the University of California, San Diego — plan to launch a small clinical trial to test the drug’s safety in children with autism later this year. The team is careful to note that reversing deficits in a mouse is far from a cure in people.

Still, some researchers we spoke with for the June article expressed concern about giving suramin to children with autism, even at small doses. They noted that suramin is a powerful drug with serious side effects, including anemia and disruption of the adrenal gland.

Others were skeptical of the proposed mechanism for the drug’s effects.

A family of receptors found on the cell surface typically responds to ATP, the body’s energy currency, and other signaling molecules known as purines. When mitochondria are disrupted — as Naviaux and his colleagues hypothesize might be the case in people with autism — purines can accumulate during infectionand damage cells.

The researchers suggest in the study that suramin alleviates autism-like symptoms in the mice by blocking purine receptors and restoring healthy metabolism.

To dig deeper, we checked in with experts on mitochondrial mechanisms and translational efforts in autism, for our discussion series, Cross Talk.

What do you think? Share your reactions and follow-up questions in the comments section below.

The Experts:

David Sulzer

Professor, Neurology, Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Columbia University

Paul Wang

Senior Vice-President and Head of Medical Research, Autism Speaks

John Jay Gargus

Director, UCI Center for Autism Research and Translation, University of California at Irvine

Long shot

Professor of Psychiatry, Neurology and Pharmacology, Columbia University

Thin evidence:While this paper discusses the shortcomings of the model and treatment clearly, it is premature to have confidence that suramin will provide therapy for autism. The various concerns are spelled out clearly and honestly in the study: The model used may not replicate autism well either in pathogenesis or behavior, and there is little evidence that problems in purine handling or transmission are particularly related to autism.

“Suramin is a relatively large-sized molecule with several actions, and it does not penetrate well into the brain. Most behaviorsassociated with autism are probably driven by abnormalities in regions of the brain into which suramin does not adequately penetrate.”

Mysterious mechanisms: “This leaves open the possibility that suramin is working in the rodent model by a different mechanism. Other than asuggestion that an unidentified cellular stress-response pathway is involved, we don’t understand why it has effects on the animals’ behaviors. Thereare many, many means to interfere with stress responses, such as antioxidants and anti-inflammatories. And while these need to be studied to determine whether they provide therapy, there is little reason to support their use for autism at this time.”

Unlikely involvement: “There is an implication in the paper that regulation of mitochondria activity could be involved, but as yet there is no evidence. New studies show that neuronal mitochondria appear to be damaged in the brains of individuals with autism, but so far only in the cortex, which suramin does not appear to reach.”

Too quick: “The authors find a behavioral improvement only two days after a single exposure to the drug. It does not seem likely that this can clear out damaged mitochondria, which accumulate for years, and replace them with better organelles so quickly.

“So while this study shows improvements in a few behaviors after the drug in one inflammatory-induced autism model, the mechanism is opaque. It isa long shot at this time that it will provide an effective treatment for autism.”

Need to work harder on trials

Senior Vice-President and Head of Medical Research, Autism Speaks

Hedging bets:Animal models of autism, such as the maternal immune activation (MIA) model studied here by Naviaux and his colleagues, are the best tools that researchers have for examining the cellular and molecular pathophysiology of autismand for testing experimental treatments before they can be advanced to human trials.

“But, of course, none of the models can be considered valid until treatment effects in them are proven to be predictive of effects in people. In the case of the MIA mouse, the authors here candidly hedge their bets by calling it a model of bothautism and schizophrenia. Meanwhile, the field of autism research wisely hedges its own bets by studying multiple treatments of the MIA mouse,including probiotics as well as antipurinergic therapy.”

Precedent lacking:Although milestones in the initial stage of testing basic research findings for translational research continue to accumulate — from mGluR5-targeted rescue of the FMR1 knockout mouse to suramin reversal of social deficits in the MIA mouse — we appear to be making little headway on the hurdles of clinical trials. From arbaclofen to oxytocin to Trichuris suis ova, clinical trial results have been tepid at best. This should not be surprising. We have no successful precedent to guide the design of clinical trials in autism.

“How should we quantitate clinical improvement — or deterioration? How long must treatment be provided before effects are evident? At what age will each treatment be most effective: 6 years? 16 years? 6 months? Which individuals will benefit most from each treatment: those with more severe or more mild symptoms? Those with regression or not? Those with or without comorbidities? Results in Phelan-McDermid syndrome (presented byJoseph Buxbaum at the 2014 International Meeting for Autism Research) represent a rare but preliminary exception to the frustrations of clinical trials.”

Clearing the hurdles:As basic research continues to generate more candidate treatments for autism, we need to work harder on clinical trials. Most especially, we need to identify measures of improvement that emerge early, potentially within a few weeks of treatment initiation and well before the broad functional improvement that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is likely to require for drug approval.”

Mechanism unclear

Director, UCI Center for Autism Research and Translation, University of California, Irvine

Imprecise effects: “I don’t think we can say that suramin is specific for purinergic receptors — it is not at all specific. Suraminaffects all G-protein-coupled receptors, a huge family of receptors that includes virtually every kind of signaling molecule that cells use to talk to one another. So as far as a mechanism, I don’t think this work tells us much.”

Trials will tell: “Before anyone jumps the gun on suramin, all one has to do is reflect on any of the many neuropsychologicaldrug trials that have cured mice but ultimately fail in treating people. The only way to gauge the empirical value of suramin will be to conduct a carefully controlled clinical trial.”

About Cross Talk
Discussions among leading experts in the field. Submit your questions to

8 responses to “Can a drug for a parasitic disease really treat autism?”

  1. Payman says:

    Even a little plausibility if any, its worth testing the theory and Suramine effects on autism. As it stands now, the genetic research has shown to be futile and basically worthless. Ofcourse it is a slap to th eface for many who have blamed and theorized genes as the main cause for past 20 years.

    Those families affected by autism and those kids who can not express their basic needs are the true victims of autism and science if any with all its players have the greatest duty to help these victims.

  2. Edie Johnson says:

    Fascinating …..As someone who has followed autism issues since college, when it was my thesis, and I try to help with local fundraising and keep up on the research, and have a friend afflicted with Rets, this is awesome ….to not just inform the public, but to enlist our thoughts and ideas in searching for a cure. I’m assuming that after finding out that marijuana can be helpful in stabilizing epileptic seizures, I’m guessing that its use has been tried to normalize synapses in Rett Syndrome children. I believe we are sitting on the threshold of a cure. Now that the MEcp2 shortage of fully functioning proteins has been identified, and gene therapies sought all over the world, its a matter of time, hopefully a short amount of time, before a cure is found Surprised, given the success with mice, that I have not heard of bone marrow transplants in clinical trials with children. Also if there have been any stem cell transplants in human subjects. So many lives depend on it.

    • Megan says:

      I actually found research that showed a doctor in India did a bone marrow transplant on a 10 year old boy in India. He went from a pretty severe autism diagnosis to no longer being able to be identified as autistic. That being said, a bone marrow transplant is extremely painful… Mario Capecchi’s research at the UofU in Utah also seems to support this idea. If mice are useless, why do we use them??? Grab some chimpanzees, give them autism, and maybe we’ll get better data. Seriously, people. You need to watch Monkey Business with Carey Grant, Marilyn Monroe, and Ginger Rogers. My older boy is fine, my younger boy has autism. If I could give my younger boy my older boy’s immune system, I totally would. They are doing a stem cell clinical trial, but it’s with the cord blood stem cells. I think that’s problematic because you’re trying to reset a faulty immune system with “bad data”.

  3. Payman says:

    Why in case of non verbal autism if brain wiring is permanent as it is thought to be so, why such variation between their states of mind. Variatiosn in level of stimming: At one specific time, ther are disconnected and fully stimming and another time they are so awake and aware and no stimming.

    At ine instant they cant afford to be touched and at another time no problem with touching.

    Same thing when sleeping: there are days they cant sleep, head shaking, feet shaking and they are days where they are so neurotypical.
    These episodes are periodic and not constant or permament. What does it mean? an influx variations of neurotransmitter molecules periodically tohave an affect.

    I dont see why researchers on autism with genetic plausibility dont take these factors into account. If genetic basis has validity then these observations can not be and should not be occurring. Like DR. Naviaux said in his paper, there is a Flare and Fade process. But this process is not one time thing, it is happening overtime periodically. More as if there is a cycle of bacteria/virus overpopulation, body immune response to fend off and repopulation again when immune system attains required treshold and these kids or caught up in this cycle.

    Could this be just hallucination…

  4. Caroline Cristina says:

    As a parent of a child with severe, life destroying autism, my husband and I are so very grateful for all and any good quality research into the cause and the cure for autism. As a medical scientist and nurse (me) and a mathematician, we realise how hard it is to find cause and effect, let a lone a tx but we hope that knowledge of this devastating neurodevelopmental condition will grow exponentially and in time help relieve our son’s torment and ours and his siblings suffering and worry over his future quality of life once his loving family has died. Thank you all!!!especially autism speaks and the mind institute in Davis. Kind regards Caroline Sydney Australia

  5. Diego says:

    Hello everyone and thank you for your time and knowledge , I’ll propose a scenario and I am not an expert just a parent of an autistic nephew who wants to help. My hypothesis is this: What happens if a hosted parasite in instestino send signals to the brain as a neurotramisor flooding the same as if it were a computer attack and brain collapses much information , it would cease to respond not attending such a sense of sight? or Hearing ? or alfato ?

  6. peaches says:

    This sounds great if it does work. Will it only be for children or will there be a strength strong enough for adults who has it also. That would be great and willing to give my sons it especially if it can stop the aggression

  7. Cary says:

    Apparently, UC San Diego is beginning a clinical trial-small study with 20 participant. I do hope that suramin (or some safe derivative within this category) or CM-AT test out to be plausible, realistic clinical interventions. We don’t have anything that is able to help with the core symptoms. As a parent, i am trying not to get my hopes up however.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *